Reliance Mobile (CDMA & GSM) - Discussion Forums: Sify Broadband To Be Sued By Its Subscriber - Reliance Mobile (CDMA & GSM) - Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • (3 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • This topic is locked

Sify Broadband To Be Sued By Its Subscriber updated - subscriber has won the case against Sify ! Rate Topic: -----

#16 User is offline   ankurraheja 

  • Member
  • Group: Members Group
  • Posts: 20
  • Joined: 20-November 05
  • Full Name: Ankur Raheja
  • City: NewDelhi or Delhi
  • Handset: Nokia 6265
  • Handset - II: - Select Handset -

Posted 25 December 2005 - 01:44 AM

View Postabhay, on Dec 13 2005, 02:43 AM, said:

he means JAN 2005

what a stupid ? to ask! bhawanoo ko samjho :grin:



"bhawanoo ko samjho" :clap:

There are lot of problems with Reliance... from Billing to R-Connect to Dhirubhai Pioneer Offer...

I will be providing more details later... n will be more active here Feb 2006 onwards.
Ankur Raheja
B.Com(H) ACS LLB MCA OCA CyLaws
Advocate - Consumer, Cyber & Corporate Laws
AnkurRaheja.com
0

#17 User is offline   Arun 

  • Thinking Bigger, Thinking Better !
  • Group: Administrator
  • Posts: 4,536
  • Joined: 23-December 03
  • Full Name: Arun Kumar D
  • City: Trivandrum
  • Handset: HTC Incredible
  • Handset - II: Blackberry 8830/8830m

Posted 25 December 2005 - 02:24 AM

Sure, glad to have you over here ! :)
Please use the [ Posted Image Report ] button (beneath every post) to report an issue with the post/topic to a moderator
0

#18 User is offline   ankurraheja 

  • Member
  • Group: Members Group
  • Posts: 20
  • Joined: 20-November 05
  • Full Name: Ankur Raheja
  • City: NewDelhi or Delhi
  • Handset: Nokia 6265
  • Handset - II: - Select Handset -

Posted 09 November 2006 - 11:39 AM

Thanks for the support friends... finally here is the good news... I won the case... here is the extract from consumer case no 1501/04: "Ankur Raheja V. SIfy Ltd and others" pronounced on 18 October 2006:

It has been held that "concealing hidden conditions and not redressing the grievances of the complainant who made complaints with regard to poor customer service on number of occassions, in our considered opinion, amounts to deficiency in service on the part of Opposite Party and indulging in to Unfair Trade Practice.

We, therefore, direct the opposite party to refund the amount of Rs 1,200/-, paid for two months by the complainant along with compensation to the tune of Rs 5,000/- for causing mental agony and harassment to the complainant and further, pay a sum of Rs 2,000/- towards cost of litigation to the complainant.”

The order makes the mention of following hidden conditions before the above para:

1. Reduction of speed to 14 Kbps after a download of 750 MB of data in the month (2004)

2. If the customer downloads more than 150 MB in a day, he is penalized in the form of reduction of package by one day (2005)

“Both the above conditions are not brought to the notice of the customer at the time of entering in to the contract.”

“Court has also held that Opposite Party has failed to provide minimum speed of 256 Kbps as per the definition of BroadBand as laid down by Telecom Regulatory Authority of India….”

Though I never claimed that explicitly… but the whole case has been interpreted from this point of view by Hornorable court. That implies that not complying with TRAI definition also resulted in ‘deficiency in service’.

Last case summary filed in court available at: http://www.sifycase.org

This post has been edited by ankurraheja: 09 November 2006 - 01:07 PM

Ankur Raheja
B.Com(H) ACS LLB MCA OCA CyLaws
Advocate - Consumer, Cyber & Corporate Laws
AnkurRaheja.com
0

#19 User is offline   tanveer 

  • RIM Veteran
  • Group: RIM Guru
  • Posts: 2,103
  • Joined: 19-June 04
  • Full Name: Tanveer
  • City: NewDelhi or Delhi
  • Handset: HTC Touch Diamond
  • Handset - II: HTC Mogul (6800)

Posted 09 November 2006 - 12:44 PM

Many congratulations buddy.people like you give hope to all of us.
Posted Image
There is no patch for ignorance...
0

#20 User is offline   ankurraheja 

  • Member
  • Group: Members Group
  • Posts: 20
  • Joined: 20-November 05
  • Full Name: Ankur Raheja
  • City: NewDelhi or Delhi
  • Handset: Nokia 6265
  • Handset - II: - Select Handset -

Posted 09 November 2006 - 01:22 PM

Thanks a lot... :)
I will be glad if it helps other consumers too....
Ankur Raheja
B.Com(H) ACS LLB MCA OCA CyLaws
Advocate - Consumer, Cyber & Corporate Laws
AnkurRaheja.com
0

#21 User is offline   ani_meher 

  • RIM Veteran
  • Group: RIM Guru
  • Posts: 1,163
  • Joined: 01-February 05
  • Full Name: ani_meher
  • City: Mumbai
  • Handset: Nokia 2865

Posted 09 November 2006 - 04:03 PM

Congrats buddy! really takes a man to go to court and fight all the way!
0

#22 User is offline   Dr.Gagan 

  • Experienced Member
  • Group: Experienced Member
  • Posts: 283
  • Joined: 30-June 05
  • Full Name: Dr Gagan Dudeja
  • City: Bangalore
  • Handset: Blackberry 8830/8830m
  • Handset - II: - Select Handset -

Posted 09 November 2006 - 08:21 PM

Hats Of Ankur keep it up......

Soham
Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience. - Confucius
0

#23 User is offline   sanket55555 

  • Advanced Member
  • Group: Experienced Member
  • Posts: 146
  • Joined: 08-April 06
  • Full Name: Sanket
  • City: Mumbai
  • Handset: Not a Reliance user

Posted 09 November 2006 - 09:32 PM

great effort buddy,
this is encouraging :clap: :clap: :clap:
0

#24 User is offline   anujit 

  • RIM Veteran
  • Group: RIM Veteran
  • Posts: 910
  • Joined: 10-March 04
  • Full Name: Anujit
  • City: Mumbai
  • Handset: Nokia 6255

Posted 09 November 2006 - 10:01 PM

Well done man!!! :) Well done!!!

But I cant believe those phuckers!!! 14kpbs speed if you download more than 750MB. The nerve!!!!
0

#25 User is offline   abhay 

  • Harry Potter
  • Group: RIM Addict
  • Posts: 731
  • Joined: 07-October 04
  • Full Name: abhay
  • City: Mumbai
  • Handset: LG FWT LST250

Posted 09 November 2006 - 11:55 PM

grooovy :SI: ANKUR.. i hope many others will follow, u have set an example for all of us here :thumb:

This post has been edited by abhay: 09 November 2006 - 11:55 PM

Posted Image


Posted Image
Posted Image
Posted Image
0

#26 User is offline   ankurraheja 

  • Member
  • Group: Members Group
  • Posts: 20
  • Joined: 20-November 05
  • Full Name: Ankur Raheja
  • City: NewDelhi or Delhi
  • Handset: Nokia 6265
  • Handset - II: - Select Handset -

Posted 10 November 2006 - 11:13 AM

Thanks a ton friends :)

Abhay thanks for the support, and surely it will be great, if others also try taking some action against Unfair Practices of the companies... otherwise companies are not going to stop !
Ankur Raheja
B.Com(H) ACS LLB MCA OCA CyLaws
Advocate - Consumer, Cyber & Corporate Laws
AnkurRaheja.com
0

#27 User is offline   ani_meher 

  • RIM Veteran
  • Group: RIM Guru
  • Posts: 1,163
  • Joined: 01-February 05
  • Full Name: ani_meher
  • City: Mumbai
  • Handset: Nokia 2865

Posted 10 November 2006 - 02:45 PM

By the way, how much money and time went into this? If at all the time required for such cases was small, I am sure Reliance would be paying through their nose now, to all the cases by unsatisfied and cheated customers.
0

#28 User is offline   ankurraheja 

  • Member
  • Group: Members Group
  • Posts: 20
  • Joined: 20-November 05
  • Full Name: Ankur Raheja
  • City: NewDelhi or Delhi
  • Handset: Nokia 6265
  • Handset - II: - Select Handset -

Posted 10 November 2006 - 04:04 PM

Mainly time is spent in intial preparation of the case that is to be filed, maybe few days to a weeks time... depending upon how long or how complicated matter is !

Then for every court date, you need to spare half day's time, which may come every 2 mnths time (approx) in a district consumer court. And you may have to appear 5-10 times in the court in 1-2 years time.

The other formailities are filing rejoinder (reply) to the Opposite party's reply submitted in the court. And before the deciding of the case, court will ask you to file the complaint in the form of affidavit. These have to be prepared too... otherise in between you just have to appear and make the court aware of the complaint. And last stage is argument, which you have the option of filing it in writing!

But there are exceptions also... like initially after filing of the case, opposite parties try to compromise, if they think there is enough proof against them or at the first hearing... court will try to make parties come to some kind of settlement.

Money spend includes Rs 100-200 (depending upon the compensation claimed) in the form of Postal order initially and money spent in commuting to the court.

This post has been edited by ankurraheja: 10 November 2006 - 04:06 PM

Ankur Raheja
B.Com(H) ACS LLB MCA OCA CyLaws
Advocate - Consumer, Cyber & Corporate Laws
AnkurRaheja.com
0

#29 User is offline   linuxguy 

  • RIM Addict
  • Group: RIM Addict
  • Posts: 670
  • Joined: 09-November 04
  • Handset: LG RD 2030

Posted 10 November 2006 - 08:48 PM

hey ankur, good work. do you have a guide / tutorial which details how we can go about prosecuting these erring companies in the consumer court? Most of us are not aware of the procedures, the terminologies, the time frame and the rulings in consumer courts.
Powered by GNU/Linux
0

#30 User is offline   Nirvana 

  • Advanced Member
  • Group: Experienced Member
  • Posts: 207
  • Joined: 13-April 06
  • Full Name: Austin
  • City: Bangalore
  • Handset: LG RD 5130
  • Handset - II: - Select Handset -

Posted 11 November 2006 - 01:38 AM

Well done Ankur, serves them right ! Inspirational stuff indeed !!!
The Key To A Safe Future Is Not In Business or Social Prosperity - It Is In Righteous Living
0

Share this topic:


  • (3 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • This topic is locked

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users