Jump to content
Reliance Jio & Reliance Mobile Discussion Forums
Sign in to follow this  
csmart

Is this a start of the end for Microsoft?

Recommended Posts

with major fumble for smart phone OS, loosing market in search engine and broswer, now is it time for OS?

HP announce that it will start shipping all its PCs with dual boot, WIndows and WebOS. if it clicks, then in future it may only sell WebOS. MS will loose one of its high paying partner, HP.

what you think? WebOS on PC, no windows.. you never know. but one thing is sure, Steve Ballmer has blunder a lot. besides, XBOX kinect, nothing is selling. i think MS should get Bill Gates back after reading below article. Gates is master of killing competition by using all means.

Read Original article here

How could Steve Ballmer screw up Microsoft's HP partnership?

Somewhere, in an alternate universe, Microsoft did the right thing: Bought Palm instead of cut a deal with Nokia. But in this reality, Microsoft screwed up, not just by letting Palm go but clearing way for HP to make the acquisition. Now HP, Microsoft's strongest OEM partner, is turncoat, planning to put WebOS on every HP PC by 2012. It's simply unthinkable.

Just 11 months ago, HP revealed plans to buy Palm for $1.2 billion -- a pittance if just to get WebOS. Four months earlier I gave "10 reasons why Microsoft should buy Palm now." But Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer and his top executives let Palm get away. (Hey, I gave good advice -- for free!) Ballmer was willing to spend $44 billion for Yahoo just a few years ago, and Nokia will reportedly receive $1 billion from Microsoft as part of the Windows Phone OS distribution deal. Palm was a garage sale, by comparison.

Palm didn't feel like a good fit for HP in April 2010, and I'm not seeing the love even today. While HP has a thriving consumer business, it's much more an enterprise company. Palm had become consumer, led by a creative management team (Microsoft culture is more analytical). There's something not right in the merged DNA. But it was a shotgun wedding, with HP desperately needing something to jumpstart its sagging mobile strategy. That HP would sell WebOS smartphones or tablets is a no-brainer. But this move into PCs is something else.

HP isn't replacing Windows -- yet -- but will offer WebOS, too. The plan is for Windows to still be primary operating system. But for how long? There would be many HP business, customer and developer benefits to offering a single platform on multiple devices. Then there is the question "To whom?" Given HP's legacy, the enterprise is a more compelling target market than consumers. Microsoft shouldn't want any customer, enterprises in particular, to buy a PC with competing operating system from a company with as reliable brand as HP.

Competitively, Microsoft must exercise caution. The company is still under extended government oversight stemming from its 2001-02 antitrust settlement. Among the complaints in the original lawsuit: Microsoft cutting different deals with OEM partners that rewarded some for their loyalty and punished others for not abiding by Microsoft's rules. In an earlier antitrust case, settled in 1995, Microsoft got into heaps of trouble for charging OEMs for Windows even if they shipped a competing operating system instead. Under terms of the newer settlement, Microsoft must offer all PC partners the same basic licensing deals; there's not much room for charging HP less as incentive to just do Windows or to add on fees for disloyalty. Microsoft's options are limited, if it wants to ever escape from government oversight.

Microsoft has made some colossal mistakes under Steve Ballmer's 11-year tenure as CEO. I predict HP will rank up there with:

  • Screwing up the smartphone OS strategy
  • Losing Microsoft's tablet lead to Apple (soon Android, too)
  • Running aground Cairo and Windows Longhorn development
  • Botching Windows Vista development and launch (there was no "wow")

HP is the world's No. 1 PC manufacturer, based on shipments, according to Gartner and IDC. If HP's WebOS strategy plays out -- and surely that means someday shipping only its OS rather than paying Windows license fees -- Microsoft will lose revenues and its most important strategic partner. Stated differently: An important partner will become a competitor.

Steve Ballmer, how did you let it come to this?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

MS in its need for speed in garnering money has let out a lot many such opportunities in the past.

Long term strategy is missing in all its actions. For the OS, it has undermined the might of a peoples movement called linux...

It is the future.. But MS is not ready for the same.

May be, as per the mentioned article,not now but MS may buy Palm in future from HP at much higher premium to 'kill' it as it has done to innumerable programs in the past.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont think webOS can replace windows 7. Its different ball game. webOS is great mobile OS. Better if HP beefs up app catalog..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

MS need to gear up..... Google is coming with lots of innovations.... time will say who will lead the market....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

×